Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Hydrogen isotopes in deprotonating #337

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Nov 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Ruibin-Liu
Copy link
Contributor

@Ruibin-Liu Ruibin-Liu commented Aug 28, 2023

Hydrogen isotopes should also be removed. Also, the documentation was old/wrong and now it is updated.

Reference Issues/PRs

NA

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes

Removing H atoms by element_symbol == "H" doesn't remove isotopes D or T.
Simply adding D and T to the list should work.

What testing did you do to verify the changes in this PR?

NA

Pull Request Checklist

  • Added a note about the modification or contribution to the ./CHANGELOG.md file (if applicable)
  • Added appropriate unit test functions in the ./graphein/tests/* directories (if applicable)
  • Modify documentation in the corresponding Jupyter Notebook under ./notebooks/ (if applicable)
  • Ran python -m py.test tests/ and make sure that all unit tests pass (for small modifications, it might be sufficient to only run the specific test file, e.g., python -m py.test tests/protein/test_graphs.py)
  • Checked for style issues by running black . and isort .

Hydrogen isotopes should also be removed. Also, the documentation was old/wrong and now it is updated.
@Ruibin-Liu
Copy link
Contributor Author

What kinds of tests should I add?

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@a-r-j
Copy link
Owner

a-r-j commented Sep 18, 2023

Thanks @Ruibin-Liu ! I think the tests you've added seem sufficient to me; anything you're unhappy with?

@Ruibin-Liu Ruibin-Liu marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2023 01:26
@Ruibin-Liu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @Ruibin-Liu ! I think the tests you've added seem sufficient to me; anything you're unhappy with?

I think it's good to go, but I am not sure why some checks failed.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 5, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@a-r-j
Copy link
Owner

a-r-j commented Oct 25, 2023

Thanks @Ruibin-Liu ! I think the tests you've added seem sufficient to me; anything you're unhappy with?

I think it's good to go, but I am not sure why some checks failed.

Looks like there was some dependency drift. If you sync up to master I expect these tests will pass :)

@a-r-j a-r-j merged commit 6e3b1a0 into a-r-j:master Nov 8, 2023
4 of 11 checks passed
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 8, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants