Metadata in glossary

[Jym77]

Add "unambiguous" and "objective" metadata in each definition.
Co-authored by @JKODU

Closes issue(s):

• Objective / Unambiguous metadata in definitions? #1003

Need for Final Call:
This will not require a Final Call (internal metadata with no external visibility).

---

Pull Request Etiquette

When creating PR:

• Make sure you requesting to pull a branch (right side) to the develop branch (left side).

After creating PR:

• Add yourself (and co-authors) as "Assignees" for PR.
• Add label to indicate if it's a Rule, Definition or Chore.
• Close the issue that the PR resolves (and make sure the issue is referenced in the top of this comment)
• Optionally request feedback from anyone in particular by assigning them as "Reviewers".

How to Review And Approve

• Go to the “Files changed” tab
• Here you will have the option to leave comments on different lines.
• Once the review is completed, find the “Review changes” button in the top right, select “Approve” (if you are really confident in the rule) or "Request changes" and click “Submit review”.
• Make sure to also review the proposed Final Call period. In case of disagreement, the longer period wins.

[jeeyyy]

@WilcoFiers @Jym77

Are we supposed to be using these attributes to be shown somewhere on the website?

[Jym77]

@WilcoFiers @Jym77

Are we supposed to be using these attributes to be shown somewhere on the website?

As far as I understand, "not now".

Currently, we just add them and hope that rule authors/reviewers will think about them.
Later, we may want to add some tests.

[WilcoFiers]

Couple of ones I disagree with.

[EmmaJP]

Mostly seems fine. Agree with most of Wilco's comments and added one or two of my own.

Changes done.

Changes done.