Use correct fuzzer options #663
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lemire
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
Yes, I actually used a different one so it's shared by the different targets. @anonrig in this case, will it only be used by the fuzzer |
|
Yes, @CarlosEduR I assume that it didn't work like that. Let's see if the results change tomorrow. |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uses correct naming for the
optionsfile. The documentation states that it should have the target name. https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/blob/master/docs/getting-started/new_project_guide.md#dictionariescc @CarlosEduR