Create nl-application.json

[johnniezen]

Translation for Dutch language
I have some errors in the file on lines 111~123, 136, 138, 317 and 318. Not sure and able how to fix.

[tomgreenfield]

Many thanks for your work on the translation, @johnniezen. Please see my review comments which should fix your JSON errors.

It's worth noting that there are imminent changes to the English version due to be merged into the next release of the tool.

[tomgreenfield]

Remove extra space after e-mail adres wat bij uw,

[taylortom]

Also question the Learning Pool reference here.

[johnniezen]

I was not sure if it is still valid, so I left it in. Might it be possible to change it with something like 'your organization' ?

[johnniezen]

Thanks for finding the typos

[taylortom]

Many thanks for the PR John!

Couple of things:

• Which commit did you base the translation on? It doesn't seem to match the latest in the master branch; the references to Learning Pool and Adapt Builder in particular caught my eye.
• We're very close to releasing a new version of the tool (i.e. days away) which will introduce some new language strings. Would be great if you could add these to your PR.

[johnniezen]

Hello Tom, if the strings are already available, please sent them, or point me were to get them and I’ll add them in the current one. As for where they came from, the file could be a little older, like from September or October, when I wanted to make a first start. Never really managed to get some minutes to finish. When I noticed the ES PR recently, I compared that with mine. If there are any mix ups, or deletions needed, just tell me so.

[taylortom]

Thanks John!

You'll find the latest version of the file here.
You can see the latest amends in-place by looking at the file's blame page (this may or may not be useful!).

[johnniezen]

Thanks Tom,
I compared the files, and a I could only see the difference in the last 4 lines, which are removed.
Hope it is all good now.

[taylortom]

@johnniezen I've just set up a quick test, and still getting differences (sorry!). Have set up this gist which will hopefully be of some help.

[johnniezen]

Hi Tom,
You gist was really helpfull. Hope to have captured all differences now.
Thank you and Tom Greenfield for all the support sofar.
Slowly getting to learn this, but I like it.

[johnniezen]

Not sure if this is still in Sync. Also looking at the Merging comment, I need to assign 2 approving reviewers. Github help notes something about using a q, but does not specify how the syntax should be.
Anyone to make a similar Gist for my like Tom Taylor did (see a little higher) and tell me how to add reviewers (or volunteer)