Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show the use of an OSGi Config Properties to control flush actions #2

Open
bhellema opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bhellema
Copy link

Customers might have complicated deployments where content may refer to other pieces of content, such as a Page might depend on a DAM asset. There's a way of controlling the dispatcher cache by leveraging the statfileslevel property to invalidate the cache when an ACTIVATE occurs however we may not want to invalidate the entire cache, or large portions of the cache when only a few resources need to be purged.

For example, if a website section /content/my-site/us/en/products leverages images from /content/dam/products, anytime an image asset in /content/dam/products is updated, we want to ensure any uses of it by web pages in /content/my-site/us/en/products are also updated. We could set a stat level of 1 that invalidates everything under /content when anything under /content changes, however this inefficient, since an update to /content/my-site/us/en/products would invalidate everything under the rest of the web site too, for example: /content/my-site/us/en/services and /content/my-site/us/en/about-us, etc.

This experiment would be to introduce an OSGi property to specify a targeted flush rule. By creating a new sling:OsgiConfig node for each flush rule set, this gives more control over the cache flush operations.

See https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/dispatcher-flush-rules/index.html for additional details.

@blefebvre blefebvre added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2020
@atopper
Copy link
Contributor

atopper commented Nov 5, 2020

This would be a useful experiment based on a customer I was researching in October.

@atopper
Copy link
Contributor

atopper commented Nov 9, 2020

If there are complex mappings, which would invalidate pages over and over, I wonder if batching options would be a good addition to this experiment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants