Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SLING-12197 - Fix lacking repoinit statements #220

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor

@niekraaijmakers niekraaijmakers commented Apr 26, 2024

Description

Related Issue

#222

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@niekraaijmakers niekraaijmakers changed the title DRAFT - SLING-12197 - add failing unit test (fix pending) SLING-12197 - add failing unit test (fix pending) Apr 28, 2024
@niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor Author

niekraaijmakers commented Apr 28, 2024

cc @cziegeler @DominikSuess @karlpauls @stefanseifert
ready for review.

@niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mtilburgadobe fyi

@niekraaijmakers niekraaijmakers changed the title SLING-12197 - add failing unit test (fix pending) SLING-12197 - Fix lacking repoinit statements Apr 29, 2024
@DominikSuess DominikSuess merged commit 36f7cad into adobe:main Apr 29, 2024
3 checks passed
@niekraaijmakers niekraaijmakers deleted the SLING-12197 branch April 29, 2024 07:05
@rombert
Copy link
Contributor

rombert commented Apr 29, 2024

Thanks a lot for taking the time to prepare this @niekraaijmakers ! I have two questions around the fix

  • can you please create a GitHub issue in this repo and explain what the fix does?
  • does it make sense to always generate the repoinit statements? When AEM users include the maven plugin in their builds, do they get anything out of this? They might, for instance, if we plan to start analysing repoinit statements, but want to make sure that this is a conscious decision

Thanks!

@stefanseifert
Copy link
Contributor

great, thanks for the quick fix!

i've provided a small update PR to this which uses different versions of wcm.io handler JARs for testing - because in the latest versions we included a workaround for SLING-12197, and this PR uses older versions without that workaround.
#221

@niekraaijmakers
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot for taking the time to prepare this @niekraaijmakers ! I have two questions around the fix

  • can you please create a GitHub issue in this repo and explain what the fix does?
  • does it make sense to always generate the repoinit statements? When AEM users include the maven plugin in their builds, do they get anything out of this? They might, for instance, if we plan to start analysing repoinit statements, but want to make sure that this is a conscious decision

Thanks!

Il create a github issue. The idea is to keep the local & integrated build aligned as much as possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants