Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add selection strategy id to ODE DecisionEvent schema #1654

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 15, 2022

Conversation

jaszhang-adobe
Copy link
Contributor

@jaszhang-adobe jaszhang-adobe commented Dec 12, 2022

Please link to the issue #1653

Add selection strategy id to propositionDetails.activity which uses activity-detail schema. Update: activity id is required field but it may cause confusion if we populate selection strategy id to activity id.

Add strategy schema and use it to add selectionStrategy field in proposition-detail schema.

Reviewers: @ngalala-adobe @guayang-adobe

@jaszhang-adobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaszhang-adobe commented Dec 13, 2022

@mjasrotia @cmathis could you please help review this PR? thanks!

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add the required field "xdm:id" in the example.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jaszhang-adobe jaszhang-adobe Dec 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks! I refactored the PR to add strategy-detail schema and add strategy id using the new schema.

@jwen-adobe jwen-adobe merged commit 0fa25ad into adobe:master Dec 15, 2022
@jaszhang-adobe jaszhang-adobe changed the title Add selectionStrategyID to activity-detail schema Add selection strategy id to ODE DecisionEvent schema Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants