Skip to content

Tokio reject_remote_clients configuration may get dropped when creating a Windows named pipe

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 4, 2023 in tokio-rs/tokio • Updated Feb 3, 2023

Package

cargo tokio (Rust)

Affected versions

>= 1.7.0, < 1.18.4
>= 1.19.0, < 1.20.3
>= 1.21.0, < 1.23.1

Patched versions

1.18.4
1.20.3
1.23.1

Description

Impact

When configuring a Windows named pipe server, setting pipe_mode will reset reject_remote_clients to false. If the application has previously configured reject_remote_clients to true, this effectively undoes the configuration. This also applies if reject_remote_clients is not explicitly set as this is the default configuration and is cleared by calling pipe_mode.

Remote clients may only access the named pipe if the named pipe's associated path is accessible via a publically shared folder (SMB).

Patches

The following versions have been patched:

  • 1.23.1
  • 1.20.3
  • 1.18.4

The fix will also be present in all releases starting from version 1.24.0.

Named pipes were introduced to Tokio in version 1.7.0, so releases older than 1.7.0 are not affected.

Workarounds

Ensure that pipe_mode is set first after initializing a ServerOptions. For example:

let mut opts = ServerOptions::new();
opts.pipe_mode(PipeMode::Message);
opts.reject_remote_clients(true);

References

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-createnamedpipea#pipe_reject_remote_clients

References

@carllerche carllerche published to tokio-rs/tokio Jan 4, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jan 4, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 6, 2023
Reviewed Jan 6, 2023
Last updated Feb 3, 2023

Severity

Moderate
5.4
/ 10

CVSS base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-22466

GHSA ID

GHSA-7rrj-xr53-82p7

Source code

Credits

Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.