increasing the range of the magnetization floattext

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

This PR increases the value of the magnetization widget, the values -1, 1 were too limited leading to low starting_magnetization values in the pw.x calculation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (bd7f39b) 56.52% compared to head (cb59eb3) 56.52%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #447   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.52%   56.52%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        2321     2321           
=======================================
  Hits         1312     1312           
  Misses       1009     1009           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.10	56.52% <ø> (ø)
python-3.8	56.57% <ø> (ø)
python-3.9	56.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/aiidalab_qe/app/configuration/advanced.py	95.27% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[unkcpz]

Thanks @AndresOrtegaGuerrero, the change looks good to me.

Just curious why it was set to +-1 in the first place. I am ignorance of the magnetization calculation, is 4 too high, or can be higher, let's see 10?

[AndresOrtegaGuerrero]

@unkcpz So if you check the code it uses input from the workchain initial_magnetic_moments and not directly the values of starting_magnetization. https://aiida-quantumespresso.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/magnetism.html

[unkcpz]

My question is more about what is the valid range of this parameter, can it be set to very high? Or usually +1 is enough? Why you want to set it to 4, is because you encounter some magnetic system that is sensitive to the starting magnetization. But I'll merge this anyway. If you need it I am convinced 😄