Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

airbyte-lib: Clean up test schema in Snowflake #35015

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

flash1293
Copy link
Contributor

With #34592 we generate a random schema name for the snowflake tests. This prevents concurrency issues in case snowflake tests are ran in multiple places at once, but the test schemas were not cleaned up - we already had 500 schemas or so.

This PR cleans up after the test to keep the test account clean - there's still a risk for stale schemas, but it's greatly reduced. Also removes the leftover no-op call.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
airbyte-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 8, 2024 1:21pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@aaronsteers aaronsteers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@aaronsteers aaronsteers merged commit 600388e into master Feb 9, 2024
23 checks passed
@aaronsteers aaronsteers deleted the flash1293/cleanup-snowflake branch February 9, 2024 00:30
jatinyadav-cc pushed a commit to ollionorg/datapipes-airbyte that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
jatinyadav-cc pushed a commit to ollionorg/datapipes-airbyte that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
jatinyadav-cc pushed a commit to ollionorg/datapipes-airbyte that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
jatinyadav-cc pushed a commit to ollionorg/datapipes-airbyte that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants