tools: replace upload_metrics

[shiqizng]

adding a python script to print TPS from the block generator reports to stdout. the output is formatted in a way that can be copied and pasted to google sheets to create bar charts.
And we decided not to use datadog for displaying the perf results; removing upload_metrics script.

output:

Scenario,Conduit_Version,Empty(no_reset)
payment.jumbo(25000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),16982.46
asset.xfer(5000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),10681.88
mixed(5000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),11453.49
mixed.jumbo(25000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),13390.13
payment.small(100),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),10010.13
payment.full(5000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),16700.66
asset.destroy(5000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),11481.67
asset.close(5000),Conduit_Dev_Build_(May22),15179.67

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5470 (fdc5ba5) into master (5ff0c22) will decrease coverage by 9.14%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5470      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.60%   46.47%   -9.14%     
==========================================
  Files         447      447              
  Lines       63395    63395              
==========================================
- Hits        35253    29461    -5792     
- Misses      25760    31425    +5665     
- Partials     2382     2509     +127     

see 203 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[tzaffi]

Approving as none of my proposed changes have any impact on function.

[tzaffi]

Suggested change

	table_header = (
	f"Scenario,Conduit_Version,{args.database_description}"
	)
	print(table_header)
	print(f"Scenario,Conduit_Version,{args.database_description}")

ignoreable nit

[tzaffi]

I recommend a comment here explaining the conventions:

"""
* scenario config files with "sm" in their name are assumed to have `TXN_PER_BLOCK_SM` transactions per block
* scenario config files with "jumbo" in their names are assumed to have `TXN_PER_BLOCK_JUMBO` transactions per block
* others are assumed to have `TXN_PER_BLOCK` transactions per block
"""

[tzaffi]

I don't think this is an issue, but just noting the fact that I'm about to change this exactness of these numbers going forward. For example, formerly the small scenarios had exactly TXN_PER_BLOCK_SM (100) but now they may have $100 + \epsilon$ .