Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Remove faulty assertion #5675

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

Eric-Warehime
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This test is flaky (see failed nightly run in https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/algorand/go-algorand/16122/workflows/feaae371-cb4f-49a5-becc-f46f2ef422d5/jobs/250292).

I've removed the assertion that the generated lists would have no duplicates--clearly the rapid test framework can and will generate some duplicates and it really doesn't matter to the logic of the test if it does.

Test Plan

Tests pass--haven't seen other parts of the test be flaky as far as I know.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5675 (fdd8a01) into master (bf60d55) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5675      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.15%   55.17%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         465      465              
  Lines       65003    65003              
==========================================
+ Hits        35850    35864      +14     
+ Misses      26760    26756       -4     
+ Partials     2393     2383      -10     

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@winder winder merged commit 7a55030 into algorand:master Aug 17, 2023
19 checks passed
@Eric-Warehime Eric-Warehime deleted the fix-peer-test-flakiness branch August 17, 2023 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants