Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump boost to v1.82.0 #5140

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Bump boost to v1.82.0 #5140

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Sep 19, 2023

No description provided.

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2023 09:20
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Sep 19, 2023

Needed to work with the updated XCode.

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Sep 25, 2023

@TimoWilken it looks like some machines have a full disk, could you have a look? See for example https://ali-ci.cern.ch/alice-build-logs/alisw/alidist/5140/32d39746d1b58e7dce806911819327935830f463/build_O2_alidist-dataflow-cs8/pretty.html

@TimoWilken
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ktf, from the log, it looks like it's running out of space in /dev/shm, i.e. running out of memory!

The machine seems to have enough disk space available (the 1TB disk is half empty).

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Sep 25, 2023

You are right. @dennisklein @rbx is there any known issue in using boost 1.83.0 with FairMQ?

@rbx
Copy link
Contributor

rbx commented Sep 25, 2023

Nothing known. But we also don't have a test environment with 1.83 afaik.

@davidrohr
Copy link
Contributor

I have been using boost 1.82 for few weeks now on my laptop without problems.
Haven't tried 1.83 yet.

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Sep 25, 2023

Let's try to use 1.82, then...

@ktf ktf changed the title Bump boost to v1.83.0 Bump boost to v1.82.0 Sep 25, 2023
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Oct 2, 2023

Still broken. I need to check in details.

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Oct 4, 2023

The issue seems to be related to running more than one workflow in parallel. Running the workflows standalone seems to work.

@davidrohr
Copy link
Contributor

OK, meanwhile I tried 1.83 locally, and that also works for me.
But I am also not running multiple workflows in parallel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants