Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/manifest parser #7

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
May 16, 2016
Merged

Feature/manifest parser #7

merged 37 commits into from
May 16, 2016

Conversation

kkocel
Copy link
Contributor

@kkocel kkocel commented Jan 19, 2016

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 78.06%

Branch #7 has no coverage reports uploaded yet.

No diff could be generated. No reports for master found.
Review entire Coverage Diff as of e817102


Uncovered Suggestions

  1. +2.58% via ...SlingerActivity.java#9...12
  2. +2.58% via ...l/Preconditions.java#6...9
  3. +1.29% via ...ReferrerMangler.java#21...22
  4. See 7 more...

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

try {
ActivityInfo activityInfo = activity.getPackageManager()
.getActivityInfo(new ComponentName(activity.getPackageName(),
"pl.allegro.android.slinger.SlingerActivity"), PackageManager.GET_META_DATA);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm, activity.getClass().getCanonicalName()?

"You cannot run this Activity without specifying Uri inside Intent!");
}

excludeSlingerAndStartTargetActivity(parentActivity,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any way to reformat this to improve readability?
extract method results to parameters?

@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ android {
sourceCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_7
targetCompatibility JavaVersion.VERSION_1_7
}
buildTypes {
release {
minifyEnabled true

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that you need some proguard rules here, at least for the Android classes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not needed. Plugin add them on t's own.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@krzysiekbielicki
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@jakubkrolewski
Copy link

👍

@@ -41,7 +42,7 @@ ext {
minSdkVersion = 9
targetSdkVersion = 23

supportAnnotations = 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.0.0'
supportAnnotations = 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.1.1'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

23.4.0

@jakubkrolewski
Copy link

👍

1 similar comment
@arturdm
Copy link

arturdm commented May 13, 2016

👍

@kkocel kkocel merged commit 7cf3a66 into master May 16, 2016
@kkocel kkocel deleted the feature/manifest-parser branch May 16, 2016 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants