Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support: Use logstash prune high cardinality fields #1838

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tlwr
Copy link
Contributor

@tlwr tlwr commented Apr 9, 2019

I haven't tested this at all, it is a PoC to start a discussion

What

We have guids in some of our field names

As of the time of writing we have over 4k fields in our index in
elasticsearch, which makes kibana hard to use

How to review

Code review

Test in the dev stack in logit

Who can review

Not @tlwr

We have guids in some of our field names

As of the time of writing we have over 4k fields in our index in
elasticsearch, which makes kibana hard to use

Signed-off-by: Toby Lorne <toby.lornewelch-richards@digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk>
@tlwr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlwr commented Apr 11, 2019

Having received a verbal thumbs up from 👑 in Slack, I will apply this to Dev

@@ -1022,4 +1022,11 @@ filter {
"[@source][director]"
]
}

prune {
blacklist_names = [
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
blacklist_names = [
blacklist_names => [

@tlwr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tlwr commented Apr 11, 2019

This is not necessary if we clear out the fields in Kibana (when old things expire the GUIDs will go away), logging stacks with low retention do not have the GUID fields.

@tlwr tlwr closed this Apr 11, 2019
@tlwr tlwr deleted the logit-prune-guids branch April 11, 2019 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant