Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#127165717] Revert "Update retention period of existing instances" #407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2016

Conversation

dcarley
Copy link
Contributor

@dcarley dcarley commented Aug 4, 2016

What

This reverts commit 788c32d.

This task and script were used to modify existing Postgres service instances
to enable backups. Any service instances created since then will have this
configuration set by the broker. So we no longer need to run this script in
the pipeline.

How to review

  1. Deploy this branch to your dev Deployer Concourse.
  2. Run the create-bosh-and-cloudfoundry pipeline up to and including post-deploy.
  3. Confirm that all of the jobs pass.
  4. Confirm that the post-deploy job hasn't run a update-rds-broker-backup-retention-period task.

Who can review

Not @dcarley

This reverts commit 788c32d.

This task and script were used to modify existing Postgres service instances
to enable backups. Any service instances created since then will have this
configuration set by the broker. So we no longer need to run this script in
the pipeline.
@keymon keymon self-assigned this Aug 4, 2016
@keymon keymon merged commit be0164e into master Aug 4, 2016
keymon added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2016
…_migration_script

[#127165717] Revert "Update retention period of existing instances"

* commit 'be0164e071572d2422d36a0119a1f18c2746bde0':
  Revert "Update retention period of existing instances"
@keymon keymon deleted the feature/127165717-remove_backup_migration_script branch August 4, 2016 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants