Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vendor._lattice: OFS1P3DX -> OFD1P3DX and IFS1P3DX -> IFD1P3DX for nexus #1346

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2024

Conversation

richardeoin
Copy link
Contributor

Lattice renamed some IO primitives when moving from Diamond to Radiant. This is, naturally, sparsely documented but I found a reference in Table 41 of 1. One letter in the name of each primitives is changed, as well as one of the inputs (i_SCLK -> i_CK). This requires a different IO Buffer specialisation for Nexus (Radiant) compared to MachXO2 and ECP5 which this PR adds.

I don't quite know which name Oxide would expect, but a quick grep among the fuzzing scripts finds the updated name (same as Radiant) and not the previous one. So I assume this change is applicable to Oxide also.

Support for Nexus was recently added in #1342

Footnotes

  1. https://www.latticesemi.com/-/media/LatticeSemi/Documents/UserManuals/RZ2/Radiant2_1_migration_guide_diamond.ashx?document_id=52926

@whitequark whitequark requested a review from wanda-phi May 4, 2024 20:02
@whitequark
Copy link
Member

r? @wanda-phi

Copy link
Member

@wanda-phi wanda-phi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r+

Copy link
Member

@whitequark whitequark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@whitequark whitequark added this pull request to the merge queue May 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into amaranth-lang:main with commit 653a51b May 4, 2024
19 checks passed
@whitequark whitequark added this to the 0.5 milestone May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants