Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(#52) Configuration of Unix connection pooling #60

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2018

Conversation

llorllale
Copy link
Contributor

This PR:

* Externalized ConnectionSocketFactory into 'UnixSocketFactory'
* LocalDocker(HttpClient, String) now public for users
* Added some javadocs
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 19, 2018

Job #60 is now in scope, role is REV

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 19, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 91

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+8.0%) to 89.524%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 85: 8.0%
Covered Lines: 94
Relevant Lines: 105

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Owner

@amihaiemil amihaiemil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@llorllale looks nice, just a comment

@@ -64,10 +68,14 @@ public LocalDocker(final File unixSocket, final String version){

/**
* Local Docker engine.
* <p>
* Users may supply their own {@link HttpClient} that must register a unix
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@llorllale ```... that must register a {@link UnixSocketFactory}, would be better and then we can remove the @see ...``

As per PR review:

* Fixed javadoc
@llorllale
Copy link
Contributor Author

@amihaiemil fixed javadoc, please review

@amihaiemil
Copy link
Owner

@rultor merge pls

@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Mar 20, 2018

@rultor merge pls

@amihaiemil OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit c1b9271 into amihaiemil:master Mar 20, 2018
@rultor
Copy link
Collaborator

rultor commented Mar 20, 2018

@rultor merge pls

@amihaiemil Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 2min)

@llorllale llorllale deleted the 52 branch March 20, 2018 14:16
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Mar 20, 2018

The job #60 is now out of scope

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants