Update ajv-keywords to the latest version 🚀

[greenkeeper]

Version 3.1.0 of ajv-keywords was just published.

Dependency	ajv-keywords
Current Version	2.1.1
Type	devDependency

The version 3.1.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of ajv-keywords.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

---

Commits

The new version differs by 12 commits.

• 5f9eccc 3.1.0
• d592465 Merge pull request #51 from jbottigliero/feature-instanceof-Promise
• 839e367 feat: "instanceof": "Promise"
• ea618a2 docs: update badge
• 2ba1418 3.0.0
• 52f8024 Merge pull request #43 from epoberezkin/greenkeeper/json-schema-test-2.0.0
• 2ee86a0 Merge pull request #48 from epoberezkin/beta
• 1b6a239 Merge branch 'master' into beta
• 5b0c5a4 fix: update for ajv v6.0.0
• 733e33b chore(package): update json-schema-test to version 2.0.0
• 506b850 3.0.0-beta.0
• 762069e refactor: remove keyword if/then/else (to ajv), closes #41, epoberezkin/ajv#586

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.

---

Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

[googlebot]

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this State. It's up to you to confirm consent of the commit author(s) and merge this pull request when appropriate.

[rsimha]

/to @cramforce @erwinmombay

[googlebot]

A Googler has manually verified that the CLAs look good, thanks! They commented:

> all commits are from greenkeeper