Pass experiment channel via the AmpRuntimeTypeParam #24723
Conversation
Yes: on inabox the ad server chooses the runtime version and so already has that in logs. In A4A the ad server needs to be told how to categorize the ad. |
| @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ export function getBinaryTypeNumericalCode(type) { | |||
| 'control': '1', | |||
| 'canary': '2', | |||
| 'rc': '3', | |||
| 'experimentA': '10', | |||
| 'experimentB': '11', | |||
| 'experimentC': '12', | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should be include mod and nomod while we're at it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah, lets go ahead and do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i'll take up the 4x range (i've been using the RC build so its 43)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so they are all essentially 43 LOL. they all have different versions, because unlike the rtv experiments they are deployed individually. the way i distinguish them differently is their custom version mark which is the last digit in the rtv (usually defaults to 0).
i can make changes to the deployment if we really need different prefixes between esm/sp/mp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LOL, I wonder how 43 is selected? Why not 42 ?😛
I don't think we need different prefixes. Also the number here doesn't need to match the prefix number. It's just an id to understand which version of runtime is used to served the A4A. As long as we agree on the id there, it should be fine. Especially that unlike exp_a/b/c, the mod/nomod experiment is temporary.
What about nomod: 42, and mod: 43 to match the style control (even): exp (odd). Let me know if every agrees on the id. Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah im ok with that. its 43 because i wanted to take the 4x range, and 3 cause rc is original 03 🤣
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🤣🤣🤣
Added mod and nomod type. PTAL
I named the param same as the experiment prefix.
One thing I found is that the param is only used for A4A, not related to inabox. So I left the
experimentX-controlalone.We should also document all the new AMP_CONFIG.type somewhere.
to @erwinmombay @jeffkaufman