Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint to version 3.14.1 🚀 #7204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 27, 2017

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint just published its new version 3.14.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint
New version 3.14.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release

  • 791f32b Fix: brace-style false positive for keyword method names (fixes #7974) (#7980) (Teddy Katz)
  • d7a0add Docs: Add ESLint tutorial embed to getting started (#7971) (Jamis Charles)
  • 72d41f0 Fix: no-var autofix syntax error in single-line statements (fixes #7961) (#7962) (Teddy Katz)
  • b9e5b68 Fix: indent rule crash on sparse array with object (fixes #7959) (#7960) (Gyandeep Singh)
  • a7bd66a Chore: Adding assign/redeclare tests to no-undefined (refs #7964) (#7965) (Kevin Partington)
  • 8bcbf5d Docs: typo in prefer-promise-reject-errors (#7958) (Patrick McElhaney)

The new version differs by 1824 commits .

  • e544644 3.14.1
  • 1297635 Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.14.1
  • 791f32b Fix: brace-style false positive for keyword method names (fixes #7974) (#7980)
  • d7a0add Docs: Add ESLint tutorial embed to getting started (#7971)
  • 72d41f0 Fix: no-var autofix syntax error in single-line statements (fixes #7961) (#7962)
  • b9e5b68 Fix: indent rule crash on sparse array with object (fixes #7959) (#7960)
  • a7bd66a Chore: Adding assign/redeclare tests to no-undefined (refs #7964) (#7965)
  • 8bcbf5d Docs: typo in prefer-promise-reject-errors (#7958)
  • 67ac93c 3.14.0
  • 2cf5810 Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.14.0
  • 506324a Fix: no-var does not fix if causes ReferenceError (fixes #7950) (#7953)
  • 05e7432 New: no-chained-assignments rule (fixes #6424) (#7904)
  • 243e47d Update: Add fixer for no-else-return (fixes #7863) (#7864)
  • f091d95 New: prefer-promise-reject-errors rule (fixes #7685) (#7689)
  • ca01e00 Fix: recognize all line terminators in func-call-spacing (fixes #7923) (#7924)

There are 250 commits in total. See the full diff.


✨ Try the all new Greenkeeper GitHub Integration ✨
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.

Screencast

Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.

@camelburrito camelburrito merged commit 1fed17f into master Jan 27, 2017
@cramforce cramforce deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-3.14.1 branch January 27, 2017 23:47
jridgewell pushed a commit to jridgewell/amphtml that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2017
torch2424 pushed a commit to torch2424/amphtml that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
mrjoro pushed a commit to mrjoro/amphtml that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants