Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Working travis config + simple integration test + node 4 support #8

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Dec 28, 2016

Conversation

andywer
Copy link
Owner

@andywer andywer commented Dec 28, 2016

Fixes #3 and #4.

@btmills

@andywer
Copy link
Owner Author

andywer commented Dec 28, 2016

Btw: I think publishing a v0.2.0 might be a good idea after merging this. (Unless you have more urgent fixes 😉)

Copy link

@btmills btmills left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Once the tests are updated to use iterate, I think this will be good to go! (Or just update one of the two, that way both the deprecated and new names are being tested.)

And yes, I think a v0.2.0 is in order! Once it's out, I'll update the PR in my repository to use the newer version and test it out.

it('throws an error when testing leaky code', () => {
const objects = []

expect(() => leakage.iteration(100, () => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3945066 later in this PR merges the change that renames iteration -> iterate, but this test is never updated to the new name, so it's only the deprecated export that's being tested.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And that, children, is why you should never skip code reviews... 😅

@andywer andywer merged commit 617fa69 into master Dec 28, 2016
@andywer andywer deleted the feature/ci branch December 28, 2016 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants