-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make password locking in user module idempotent #43671
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ansibot
added
affects_2.7
This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.7
bug
This issue/PR relates to a bug.
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
module
This issue/PR relates to a module.
needs_triage
Needs a first human triage before being processed.
small_patch
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
labels
Aug 5, 2018
gaddman
force-pushed
the
idempotent_lock
branch
from
August 5, 2018 07:08
c207ee6
to
4469a12
Compare
sivel
changed the title
user.py password locking
make password locking in user module idempotent
Aug 6, 2018
ansibot
added
the
stale_ci
This PR has been tested by CI more than one week ago. Close and re-open this PR to get it retested.
label
Aug 14, 2018
Sure would be nice to get this merged! It's a shame to have fixes ready to go that are just sitting in PRs waiting for someone to merge them. |
ansibot
added
needs_rebase
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/dev_guide/developing_rebasing.html
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
support:community
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible community.
and removed
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
stale_ci
This PR has been tested by CI more than one week ago. Close and re-open this PR to get it retested.
labels
Nov 8, 2018
samdoran
force-pushed
the
idempotent_lock
branch
from
November 8, 2018 21:38
9a8ef9e
to
17f4f18
Compare
ansibot
removed
the
needs_rebase
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/dev_guide/developing_rebasing.html
label
Nov 8, 2018
samdoran
force-pushed
the
idempotent_lock
branch
from
November 9, 2018 00:21
17f4f18
to
3fd89fa
Compare
ansibot
added
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
and removed
needs_revision
This PR fails CI tests or a maintainer has requested a review/revision of the PR.
labels
Nov 9, 2018
abadger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2018
* Simplify logic and add FreeBSD & NetBSD * Remove incorrect flag for lock and unlock on FreeBSD * Add tests and changelog Co-authored-by: Chris Gadd <gaddman@email.com> (cherry picked from commit f75a84e) Co-authored-by: Christopher Gadd <gaddman@email.com>
Ghilli3
pushed a commit
to Ghilli3/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2018
* Simplify logic and add FreeBSD & NetBSD * Remove incorrect flag for lock and unlock on FreeBSD * Add tests and changelog Co-authored-by: Chris Gadd <gaddman@email.com>
mattclay
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2018
* Simplify logic and add FreeBSD & NetBSD * Remove incorrect flag for lock and unlock on FreeBSD * Add tests and changelog Co-authored-by: Chris Gadd <gaddman@email.com> (cherry picked from commit f75a84e) Co-authored-by: Christopher Gadd <gaddman@email.com>
mjmayer
pushed a commit
to mjmayer/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 30, 2018
* Simplify logic and add FreeBSD & NetBSD * Remove incorrect flag for lock and unlock on FreeBSD * Add tests and changelog Co-authored-by: Chris Gadd <gaddman@email.com>
Tomorrow9
pushed a commit
to Tomorrow9/ansible
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2018
* Simplify logic and add FreeBSD & NetBSD * Remove incorrect flag for lock and unlock on FreeBSD * Add tests and changelog Co-authored-by: Chris Gadd <gaddman@email.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
affects_2.7
This issue/PR affects Ansible v2.7
bug
This issue/PR relates to a bug.
core_review
In order to be merged, this PR must follow the core review workflow.
module
This issue/PR relates to a module.
support:community
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible community.
support:core
This issue/PR relates to code supported by the Ansible Engineering Team.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
Fixes #43670 to add idempotency to the user password locking
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
user.py
ANSIBLE VERSION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Will add commits for other OSs later.