New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
s3_bucket: don't always call policy/requestPayment/versioning API #46746
s3_bucket: don't always call policy/requestPayment/versioning API #46746
Conversation
Hi @pilou-, Thank you for the pullrequest, just so you are aware we have a dedicated Working Group for aws. |
I get the following message:
|
6199888
to
5139d59
Compare
I still get recursion problem. I've rebased my PR on top of both of your changes
|
2f79500
to
d303957
Compare
CI failure in integration tests: https://app.shippable.com/github/ansible/ansible/runs/88071/67/tests |
484f1ae
to
06d7c08
Compare
06d7c08
to
982b944
Compare
982b944
to
779559b
Compare
779559b
to
161893d
Compare
11b7e24
to
25c863b
Compare
25c863b
to
c77487b
Compare
c77487b
to
206ac87
Compare
Don't fail when policy, requestPayment, tagging or versioning API is not implemented by the endpoint and if related parameters policy, requester_pays, tags or versioning are None.
206ac87
to
e2d3186
Compare
Rebased in order to trigger shippable. |
Closing and re-opening to trigger CI. |
Don't fail when policy, requestPayment, tagging or versioning API is not implemented by the endpoint and if related parameters policy, requester_pays, tags or versioning are None.
SUMMARY
don't call
policy
/requestPayment
/versioning
API when default value is used with parameterspolicy
/requester_pays
/versioning
.Fix the following error:
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
s3_bucket
ANSIBLE VERSION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
With #46745, it allows to use
s3_bucket
with Scaleway Object Storage (if you're willing to test these changes with the Scaleway service, there is currently a free public beta).