Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RBAC rules to side-nav #9159

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

nixocio
Copy link
Contributor

@nixocio nixocio commented Jan 25, 2021

Add RBAC rules to side-nav.

See: #4426

Screen.Recording.2021-01-25.at.2.10.37.PM.mov

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

@unlikelyzero
Copy link

@jakemcdermott do you have a link to the api change to reduce the number of requests based on the changes to the /me/config endpoint?

@unlikelyzero unlikelyzero added the type:feature prioritized on a feature board label Feb 12, 2021
Add RBAC rules to side-nav.

See: ansible#4426
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

@@ -39,6 +46,48 @@ function App() {
const match = useRouteMatch();
const { hash, search, pathname } = useLocation();

const fetchUserData = async () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This adds a lot of logic to the App component... I'm wondering if it can be moved down into a new component instead (maybe something wrapping <Login>? We did a lot of work last year to keep these top level components nice and streamlined, and I'd hate to lose some of that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @keithjgrant, thanks for your comment. I did think about a context that could be updated by the login component, and store information about the logged user. This could avoid de-duplicate a few requests inside the AppContainer that check the same data. The drawback is that we will have one of more context. In this case we will probably need to wrap the whole application on this new context. I will explore the idea to move logic to the login component. If you have a specific suggestion, just let me know.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'd avoid a new context I think. I'd see what would happen you either move it into tho Login component, or create a new component that wraps the Login component to encapsulate that logic and expose the callbacks props needed to interact with it

@tiagodread
Copy link
Contributor

Waiting on API change cc @jakemcdermott

@mabashian
Copy link
Member

At the moment I believe this is blocked by #9908 @nixocio is that correct? If not feel free to remove the blocked label.

@nixocio
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixocio commented May 24, 2021

Closing this one in favor of #10249

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:api component:ui type:feature prioritized on a feature board
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants