Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small improvements to approver. #2229

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

germa89
Copy link
Collaborator

@germa89 germa89 commented Aug 7, 2023

Links to comment and user.

@github-actions github-actions bot added CI/CD Related with CICD, Github Actions, etc Maintenance General maintenance of the repo (libraries, cicd, etc) labels Aug 7, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2229 (5a534a0) into main (2221a7b) will increase coverage by 1.37%.
Report is 75 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 93.75%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2229      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.43%   87.81%   +1.37%     
==========================================
  Files          45       45              
  Lines        7971     8296     +325     
==========================================
+ Hits         6890     7285     +395     
+ Misses       1081     1011      -70     

@germa89
Copy link
Collaborator Author

germa89 commented Aug 7, 2023

LGTM.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Approving this PR because germa89 said so 😬

@germa89 germa89 merged commit 00d0b11 into main Aug 7, 2023
26 checks passed
@germa89 germa89 deleted the ci/small-change-to-approver-bot branch August 7, 2023 17:20
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ on:
issue_comment:
types: [created, edited]

env:
# sintax: ("germa89" "author2")

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @germa89. We love this action and using in PyVista project too. I have one question in pyvista/pyvista#5314. Is there any reason why we cannot use comma(,) between authors? Thanks for your great job.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @tkoyama010 ! I am not sure why. I guess the GitHub run parse that env var again when passing it to the shell script that later execute for the job. But I don't know. I didn't really face the issue I think. Sorry for not being more helpful!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind. The author's comments are very valuable. I will test it when I get a chance.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you post the link of those comments here?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. But I think it will be a little later to test it.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI/CD Related with CICD, Github Actions, etc Maintenance General maintenance of the repo (libraries, cicd, etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants