-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eslint integration #2885
Eslint integration #2885
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2885 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.61% 97.61%
=======================================
Files 24 24
Lines 5156 5159 +3
Branches 460 460
=======================================
+ Hits 5033 5036 +3
Misses 122 122
Partials 1 1
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rickstaa This is basic integration of eslint. As you see most of rules inside eslintrc.json
under comments, enabled only object-shorthand
and default. We can gradually uncomment rules and improve code quality. I also added checking lints on continuous integration and pre commit hook.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my comments. Appart from these two, I think this PR is good to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my suggestion
* eslint integration * ci & pre commit * dev * dev * dev
* eslint integration * ci & pre commit * dev * dev * dev
* eslint integration * ci & pre commit * dev * dev * dev
Related to #2882 (comment)