New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #533 - Create scanner with default user auths #744
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ public BatchScanner createBatchScanner(String tableName, Authorizations authoriz | |
return createBatchScanner(tableName, authorizations, numQueryThreads); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public BatchScanner createBatchScanner(String tableName) throws TableNotFoundException, | ||
AccumuloSecurityException, AccumuloException { | ||
Authorizations auths = securityOperations().getUserAuthorizations(context.getPrincipal()); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See comment above. This is okay for a first pass implementation, but not sufficient with pluggable authorization providers which could have an infinite set of auths. |
||
return createBatchScanner(tableName, auths); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public BatchDeleter createBatchDeleter(String tableName, Authorizations authorizations, | ||
int numQueryThreads, BatchWriterConfig config) throws TableNotFoundException { | ||
|
@@ -193,6 +200,13 @@ public Scanner createScanner(String tableName, Authorizations authorizations) | |
return scanner; | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public Scanner createScanner(String tableName) throws TableNotFoundException, | ||
AccumuloSecurityException, AccumuloException { | ||
Authorizations auths = securityOperations().getUserAuthorizations(context.getPrincipal()); | ||
return createScanner(tableName, auths); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public String whoami() { | ||
ensureOpen(); | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
59 changes: 0 additions & 59 deletions
59
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/impl/ClientInfoFactory.java
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of creating this new method could add javadoc to the existing method linking to
securityOperations().getUserAuthorizations()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the pluggable authorizations, a user could have an infinite set. So, it may not be sufficient to document that they retrieve and submit their authorizations. I think it makes more sense to provide the method. The first pass implementation could get the user authorizations, but later, we'll probably want to pass along a flag that says "don't intersect with user-provided auths" to the visibility filter when it evaluates visibilities.