Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on October 04, 2022 #26864

Closed
15 of 42 tasks
potiuk opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
15 of 42 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on October 04, 2022 #26864

potiuk opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Oct 4, 2022

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider google: 8.4.0rc2

Provider slack: 6.0.0rc2

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@potiuk potiuk added the kind:meta High-level information important to the community label Oct 4, 2022
@Taragolis
Copy link
Contributor

Taragolis commented Oct 4, 2022

#26845, #25852, #26459, #26452: Test on different airflow version with upgrade from one to another. Looks good
#26648: Working fine with not significant findings (could be change in next version of provider): Warning message about unused parameters shown unless explicit set link_names to None, default value False
#26118: Seems ok

@josh-fell
Copy link
Contributor

#25604 looks good

@Voldurk
Copy link
Contributor

Voldurk commented Oct 5, 2022

#25746 Tested OK on Composer with Airflow 2.2.5

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Oct 5, 2022

I also marked as tested the RC1 tested issues as there have been tested in rc1 and we had a very few changes since that should not impact those.

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Oct 8, 2022

Released

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Oct 8, 2022
@potiuk potiuk added the testing status Status of testing releases label Dec 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants