Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation about "providers.jdbc" "allow_driver_path_in_extra" configuration to jdbc provider.yaml #35499

Closed
1 task done
potiuk opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #35580
Closed
1 task done
Assignees
Labels
good first issue kind:meta High-level information important to the community

Comments

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Nov 7, 2023

Body

The definition and description of the configuraiton is missing in provider.yaml - it should be added as for all the other provider configuration

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@potiuk potiuk added kind:meta High-level information important to the community good first issue labels Nov 7, 2023
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Nov 7, 2023

cc: @pankajkoti @eladkal

@pankajkoti pankajkoti self-assigned this Nov 7, 2023
pankajkoti added a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2023
Version 4.0.0 of the JDBC provider added configuration options
in airflow.cfg to be configured so that based on its value
the driver_path and driver_class values set in the connection's
extra field are utilised. The definition and description of this
configuraiton is missing in provider.yaml. Adding the same here.

closes: apache#35499
potiuk pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2023
Version 4.0.0 of the JDBC provider added configuration options
in airflow.cfg to be configured so that based on its value
the driver_path and driver_class values set in the connection's
extra field are utilised. The definition and description of this
configuraiton is missing in provider.yaml. Adding the same here.

closes: #35499
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue kind:meta High-level information important to the community
Projects
None yet
2 participants