New generic tableau operator: TableauOperator

[mariotaddeucci]

Added an generic tableau operator to execute multiple methods on python client.

[boring-cyborg]

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst)
Here are some useful points:

• Pay attention to the quality of your code (flake8, mypy and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
• In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
• Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it’s a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
• Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
• Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
• Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
  Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
  In case of doubts contact the developers at:
  Mailing List: dev@airflow.apache.org
  Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

[eladkal]

left comments in the code.
Note that also requires tests for TableauOperator

[mariotaddeucci]

@eladkal I adapt the tests from TableauRefreshWorkbookOperator and the tests from PR #16937

[eladkal]

@mariotaddeucci we just merged #16916 can you please rebase and fix conflicts?

[mariotaddeucci]

@eladkal @potiuk the unit tests have run successfully now ✅

[potiuk]

Static checks and docs are still failing I am afraid.

[mariotaddeucci]

@eladkal the last commit haven't passed on on CI Build / Build and test provider packages wheel because pypsrc on Microsoft provider and wasn't caused by this PR. Is there anything else that this PR needs?

[potiuk]

New dependency was added by new provider and you need to rebase to get it working I am afraid :)

[eladkal]

LGTM (left one comment on but it's not that important)

[github-actions]

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

[boring-cyborg]

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!

[potiuk]

Woohoo!

[mariotaddeucci]

Thanks all for supporting me on this PR @eladkal @potiuk