Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add correct widgets in Docker Hook #28700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2023

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jan 3, 2023

The change #28363 refactored DockerHook and by mistake it missed the
propoer widget specification. For some reason the tests did not
catch it (to be investigated) but this should fix the failing
tests.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

The change   refactored DockerHook and by mistake it missed the
propoer widget specification. For some reason the tests did not
catch it (to be investigated) but this should fix the failing
tests.
potiuk added a commit to potiuk/airflow that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2023
Those tests are running various tests with Providers Manager and
could catch errors introduced by provider-only changes so they
should be added to "Always" tests to be "always" run in our CI.

Skipping this test was the main reason why apache#28700 change was needed after
the apache#28363 was merged.
@jedcunningham jedcunningham merged commit af2c22a into apache:main Jan 3, 2023
jedcunningham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2023
Those tests are running various tests with Providers Manager and
could catch errors introduced by provider-only changes so they
should be added to "Always" tests to be "always" run in our CI.

Skipping this test was the main reason why #28700 change was needed after
the #28363 was merged.
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jan 4, 2023

Thanks @jedcunningham !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants