Restore Python 3.12 support for Databricks #38207
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
potiuk
requested review from
Taragolis,
eladkal,
pankajkoti,
hussein-awala,
josh-fell and
amoghrajesh
|
Are we proceeding with disable of |
eladkal
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2024
|
Taragolis
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BTW, maybe also bump coverage in devel-test extras to 7.4+ ?
Line 348 in 832571c
Good idea. |
We excluded Python 3.12 from Databricks provider, because it was failing our Python 3.12 tests intermittently (but often enough to make a difference). It turned out that this was caused by running the tests with coverage enabled and PEP 669 implementation in Python 3.12 impacting intermittently performance of tests run with coverage. However seems that experimenetal PEP 669 support implemented in coverage 7.4.0 is nicely handling the performance issues and after apache#38194 we shoudl be able to enable Python 3.12 for Databricks without impacting our tests. Related: databricks/databricks-sql-python#369
potiuk
force-pushed
the
restore-databricks-python-3-12-support
branch
from
bf61df5
to
1ad0864
Compare
ephraimbuddy
added
the
changelog:skip
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
to astronomer/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
We excluded Python 3.12 from Databricks provider, because it was failing our Python 3.12 tests intermittently (but often enough to make a difference). It turned out that this was caused by running the tests with coverage enabled and PEP 669 implementation in Python 3.12 impacting intermittently performance of tests run with coverage. However seems that experimenetal PEP 669 support implemented in coverage 7.4.0 is nicely handling the performance issues and after apache#38194 we shoudl be able to enable Python 3.12 for Databricks without impacting our tests. Related: databricks/databricks-sql-python#369
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We excluded Python 3.12 from Databricks provider, because it was failing our Python 3.12 tests intermittently (but often enough to make a difference). It turned out that this was caused by running the tests with coverage enabled and PEP 669 implementation in Python 3.12 impacting intermittently performance of tests run with coverage. However seems that experimenetal PEP 669 support implemented in coverage 7.4.0 is nicely handling the performance issues and after #38194 we shoudl be able to enable Python 3.12 for Databricks without impacting our tests.
Related: databricks/databricks-sql-python#369
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.