feat(go/adbc/driver): Adbc Driver for Snowflake

[zeroshade]

Initial work to start creating a snowflake ADBC driver which we can eventually package up like we do for the Flight SQL driver. Currently only GetInfo and GetObjects are implemented, but it's a start!

Will have to add secrets to the repo eventually to allow tests to work.

This relies on snowflakedb/gosnowflake#781 getting merged first

[github-actions]

⚠️ Please follow the Conventional Commits format in CONTRIBUTING.md for PR titles.

[zeroshade]

requires snowflakedb/gosnowflake#769 in order to work properly

[lidavidm]

Cool!

Let me know if you need help adding secrets (but the process should just be file INFRA Jira, then email to private@apache.org when you get the go-ahead, in case you haven't done it before)

[zeroshade]

@lidavidm I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24477 to get it added.

[zeroshade]

@lidavidm This is ready for review now, though the CI/tests aren't going to pass until I get the SNOWFLAKE_URI secret added as per the JIRA ticket I filed. In the meantime, the rest of the code can be reviewed and looked at. Though this still relies on some PRs for the gosnowflake lib that haven't gotten merged yet.

[lidavidm]

Those are some...interesting type conversions we have going on here.

LGTM in general. It seems the driver is mostly straightforward once you get the herculean effort of fixing up the underlying driver out of the way?

[lidavidm]

Maybe we should eventually standardize something like Flight SQL's scheme for encoding this sort of info...

[zeroshade]

@lidavidm My change on the snowflake repo has been merged and I've updated the go.mod here to point to that commit hash. They release on a monthly schedule so the next actual release which will include this change won't be until the end of May, at which point we can update the go.mod to point to that specific version tag.

So this is good to go!

[zeroshade]

Actually, I should update the install and package files for this shouldn't I? or should that be a separate change?

[lidavidm]

Actually, I should update the install and package files for this shouldn't I? or should that be a separate change?

Up to you - whatever is easier