Use InMemoryColumnChunkReader (~20% faster)

[tustvold]

Which issue does this PR close?

Part of #1163

Rationale for this change

#1810 added the InMemoryColumnChunkReader, but I stupidly neglected to actually hook it up 🤦

What changes are included in this PR?

Alters ParquetRecordBatchStream to use the InMemoryColumnChunkReader to avoid an unnecessary copy. For large column chunks, this represents a significant saving.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1956 (9edb297) into master (464e8d1) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 9edb297 differs from pull request most recent head 7e308a4. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7e308a4 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1956   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.47%   83.47%           
=======================================
  Files         221      221           
  Lines       57049    57046    -3     
=======================================
  Hits        47621    47621           
+ Misses       9428     9425    -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
parquet/src/arrow/async_reader.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
arrow/src/datatypes/datatype.rs	65.42% <0.00%> (-0.38%)	⬇️
parquet_derive/src/parquet_field.rs	65.98% <0.00%> (+0.22%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 464e8d1...7e308a4. Read the comment docs.

[Ted-Jiang]

@tustvold does this means we not support SerializedPageReader any more?
Or choose by user pick it up?

[tustvold]

SerializedPageReader is still used by the sync APIs, i.e. SerializedFileReader, etc...