Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Documentation] Add List View and Large List View to status.rst #38870

Closed
felipecrv opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38871
Closed

[Documentation] Add List View and Large List View to status.rst #38870

felipecrv opened this issue Nov 23, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38871

Comments

@felipecrv
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the enhancement requested

Update https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/docs/source/status.rst to say list-view types are supported in C++ and Go implementations.

Component(s)

Documentation

felipecrv added a commit to felipecrv/arrow that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2023
pitrou pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2023
….rst (#38871)

### Rationale for this change

Documentation needs to be up-to-date.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Marking C++ and Go as supporting the list-view types.

### Are these changes tested?

N/A
* Closes: #38870

Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
@pitrou pitrou added this to the 15.0.0 milestone Nov 23, 2023
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
…status.rst (apache#38871)

### Rationale for this change

Documentation needs to be up-to-date.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Marking C++ and Go as supporting the list-view types.

### Are these changes tested?

N/A
* Closes: apache#38870

Authored-by: Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <felipekde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants