Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-10265: [CI] Use smaller build when cache doesn't exist on Travis CI #8424

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kou
Copy link
Member

@kou kou commented Oct 10, 2020

Because Travis CI has "No output has been received in the last 10m0s"
limitation. If we build many modules, we will reach the limitation.

Because Travis CI has "No output has been received in the last 10m0s"
limitation. If we build many modules, we will reach the limitation.
@kszucs
Copy link
Member

kszucs commented Oct 10, 2020

Tricky!

@github-actions
Copy link

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Oct 10, 2020

I hope that this fixes "C++ on ARM" failure only on master.

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Oct 10, 2020

+1

I want to try this on master.

@kou kou closed this in 0a105a3 Oct 10, 2020
@kou kou deleted the travis-use-small-build-without-cache branch October 10, 2020 12:13
@nealrichardson
Copy link
Member

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Oct 11, 2020

Thanks for the suggestion.
In my experience, travis_wait may introduce other problem. I don't remember but the output may be lost on timeout.
Anyway, it's worth a try. Because this approach works https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/arrow/builds but is tricky.

GeorgeAp pushed a commit to sirensolutions/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2021
…s CI

Because Travis CI has "No output has been received in the last 10m0s"
limitation. If we build many modules, we will reach the limitation.

Closes apache#8424 from kou/travis-use-small-build-without-cache

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants