Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-1871] Move ProtoCoder to new sdks/java/extensions/protobuf package. #2664

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

lukecwik
Copy link
Member

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

Note that I got rid of ProtoCoder as a fallback coder after discussing with @kennknowles with a plan to replace the mechanism with a different override mechanism which is better with an automatic service registration scheme.

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

lukecwik commented Apr 24, 2017

R: @kennknowles @dhalperi

Copy link
Contributor

@dhalperi dhalperi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

File a JIRA for the fallback coder issue?

<groupId>org.xolstice.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>protobuf-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<protocArtifact>com.google.protobuf:protoc:${protobuf.version}:exe:${os.detected.classifier}</protocArtifact>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drop the grpc stuff?

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member Author

Filed BEAM-2067

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 57535f3 Apr 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants