Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mount trait usage example #3140

Closed
squakez opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3166
Closed

Mount trait usage example #3140

squakez opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3166
Assignees
Labels
area/documentation Documentation task area/traits good first issue Does not require full understanding of the codebase

Comments

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor

squakez commented Mar 29, 2022

Provide some example to show how to use the trait. See other examples in https://github.com/apache/camel-k/tree/main/examples/traits as a reference.

@squakez squakez added good first issue Does not require full understanding of the codebase area/documentation Documentation task labels Mar 29, 2022
@haanhvu
Copy link
Contributor

haanhvu commented Mar 29, 2022

Hi @squakez, since I already am working on mount trait in #2994, I would love to work on this trait's example too.

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Mar 29, 2022

Sure, probably it makes sense you start creating an example with the actual way of using volume in mount trait, so you can get some hands on the concepts you'll be working on.

@squakez squakez changed the title More examples for traits usage Mount trait usage example Mar 29, 2022
@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Mar 29, 2022

You can base your examples on this one as well: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/tree/main/examples/volumes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/documentation Documentation task area/traits good first issue Does not require full understanding of the codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants