Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

simplify platforms handling/configuration #3164

Closed
lburgazzoli opened this issue Apr 3, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3358
Closed

simplify platforms handling/configuration #3164

lburgazzoli opened this issue Apr 3, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3358
Labels
area/core Core features of the integration platform area/managed-service Camel K as a Managed Service status/stale

Comments

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

We have not a concept of primary and secondary platform but it is not easy to understand all the implications and the configuration is not simple.

As follow up of #3162, I wonder if we should use the lock name form the operator as the name of the platform the operator is bound to.
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli changed the title simplify platform handling simplify platforms handling/configuration Apr 3, 2022
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli added area/managed-service Camel K as a Managed Service area/core Core features of the integration platform labels Apr 3, 2022
@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thinking a little bit more about the issue, can't we use KAMEL_OPERATOR_IDas a way to set both the lock id and the name of the platform the operator should use ?

@christophd christophd mentioned this issue Jun 14, 2022
Merged
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 15 days.
If you think that’s incorrect or the issue should never stale, please simply write any comment.
Thanks for your contributions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/core Core features of the integration platform area/managed-service Camel K as a Managed Service status/stale
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Improve multi operator handling and multi tenancy model christophd/camel-k
1 participant
@lburgazzoli