CAMEL-19386: Support object property on template bean

[igarashitm]

Description

Fixes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19386

Also fixed the annotation for beans property on TemplatedRouteDefinitionDeserializer and RouteTemplateDefinitionDeserializer to represent what deserializers actually supports in the generated schema

Target

• I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (note that Camel 3 uses camel-3.x, whereas Camel 4 uses the main branch)

Tracking

• If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked there is a JIRA issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it).

Apache Camel coding standards and style

• I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful subject line and body.

• I formatted the code using mvn -Pformat,fastinstall install && mvn -Psourcecheck

Cc @lburgazzoli

Hi @grgrzybek , I believe I made it backward compatible for XML DSL for template bean property, while it adds properties to accept object property like non-template bean style. Hopefully this won't bother your current work...

[github-actions]

🌟 Thank you for your contribution to the Apache Camel project! 🌟

🐫 Maintainers, please note that first-time contributors require manual approval for the GitHub Actions to run.

⚠️ Please note that the changes on this PR may be tested automatically if they change components.

If necessary Apache Camel Committers may access logs and test results in the job summaries!

[github-actions]

Components tested:

Total	Tested	Failed ❌	Passed ✅
1	1	2	0

[github-actions]

Components tested:

Total	Tested	Failed ❌	Passed ✅
1	1	2	0

[igarashitm]

hmm components/camel-spring-xml tests doesn't fail for me, can I look at the workflow test log?

[grgrzybek]

I'll check this PR before noon (CEST).

[grgrzybek]

yes, this is what I was thinking about and it's ok (in org.apache.camel.model.BeanFactoryDefinition):

@XmlElement(name = "properties")
@XmlJavaTypeAdapter(BeanPropertiesAdapter.class)
private Map<String, Object> properties;

[grgrzybek]

This YAML/XML/JAXB consistency is tricky, but finally I got the PR - looks good ;)

[oscerd]

It's there something to know in relation to the work ongoin in apache/camel-kamelets#1475

[oscerd]

It's there something to know in relation to the work ongoing in apache/camel-kamelets#1475 ?

[igarashitm]

@oscerd There shouldn't be any problem - this change fixes the schema to allow both property styles, so apache/camel-kamelets#1475 is not mandatory after this. But I think it's still beneficial to do that and align the style with non-template bean on official Kamelets.

[oscerd]

I'll complete the work on that side. Thanks