This repository has been archived by the owner on May 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Handle empty "Access-Control-Request-Headers" header #135
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
+1 |
When "Access-Control-Request-Headers" is empty, return an empty "Access-Control-Allow-Headers" in the response. This is the same behaviour as when the "Access-Control-Request-Headers" header is omitted from the request entirely. Fixes COUCHDB-3090
willholley
force-pushed
the
3090-handle-empty-access-control-request-headers
branch
from
232bfe6
to
086567c
Compare
|
I've seen a few users run into this problem. Any chance of getting it merged now we past 2.0? |
|
+1 |
|
Thanks a lot. Will wee find this in CouchDB v1.7? |
|
@barbalex Yes. |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When "Access-Control-Request-Headers" is empty, return an empty
"Access-Control-Allow-Headers" in the response. This is the same
behaviour as when the "Access-Control-Request-Headers" header is
omitted from the request entirely.
Fixes COUCHDB-3090