Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CURATOR-634: Re-introduce TravisCI for testing on Linux ARM64 #412

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

martin-g
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org>
This way it won't be checked by maven-rat-plugin

Signed-off-by: Martin Tzvetanov Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org>
@martin-g
Copy link
Member Author

Any feedback on the proposal to (re-)use TravisCI for testing on Linux ARM64 ?

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

I'm unfamiliar with how the old Travis CI set up. Thus cc @Randgalt @eolivelli please take a look.

Copy link
Member

@tisonkun tisonkun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@martin-g I learn more about running travis tasks on Apache projects recently and agree that this patch is good to merge. Comments inline.

arch: arm64-graviton2
group: edge
virt: vm
language: generic
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
language: generic
language: java

Why not use a java env? In this approach you don't have to install maven manually.

@martin-g
Copy link
Member Author

martin-g commented Jul 5, 2022 via email

@tisonkun
Copy link
Member

tisonkun commented Jul 5, 2022

@martin-g Perhaps you can introduce a maven wrapper in curator repository first. It will be a good solution for such issues.

@martin-g
Copy link
Member Author

martin-g commented Jul 5, 2022

I'd rather just close the PR than play that limbo.

@martin-g martin-g closed this Jul 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants