Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-20223] The RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator and SourceCoordi… #14143

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

becketqin
Copy link
Contributor

…nator executor thread should use the user class loader.

What is the purpose of the change

This patch fixes two class loader related problems:

  1. Currently the RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator does not use the user class loader when creating the internal coordinator or calling start. ClassNotFoundException could be thrown due to this. The patch fixes this issue by creating and starting the internal operator coordinator using the user class loader.
  2. The SourceCoordinator executor thread does not run with user class loader at this point. Because that thread is going to interact with the custom implementation of SplitEnumerator, it should run with user class loader as well.

Brief change log

  • Fix RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator to create and start internal coordinators in user class loader.
  • Fix the SourceCoordinator executor thread to run with user class loader.

Verifying this change

Unit tests have been added / modified to test the change.

  • RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinatorTest.
  • SourceCoordinatorProviderTest.testUserClassLoaderInCoordinatorExecutor()

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

…nator executor thread should use the user class loader.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 2dd03fd (Thu Nov 19 18:07:05 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Nov 19, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@StephanEwen StephanEwen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The basic fix is good, but I would extend this with passing the User Code Classloader directly. It is fragile to assume that the thread calling the creation (a scheduler thread) has the usercode class loader always.

I can take this over and make the remaining changes.

private Thread t;

CoordinatorExecutorThreadFactory(String coordinatorThreadName) {
this.coordinatorThreadName = coordinatorThreadName;
this.t = null;
this.cl = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be safer to pass the user code classloader here directly, rather than relying on the context class loader. That seems fragile.

@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ private RecreateOnResetOperatorCoordinator(
long closingTimeoutMs) throws Exception {
this.context = context;
this.provider = provider;
this.userClassLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above.

@becketqin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@StephanEwen Thanks for the suggestion. Passing in the user class loader is indeed more explicit.

@StephanEwen
Copy link
Contributor

Merged as part of this change 40bbc17

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants