Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-12009] Fix wrong check message about heartbeat interval for HeartbeatServices #8048

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yanghua
Copy link
Contributor

@yanghua yanghua commented Mar 26, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

This pull request fixes wrong check message about heartbeat interval for HeartbeatServices

Brief change log

  • Fix wrong check message about heartbeat interval for HeartbeatServices

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Mar 26, 2019

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ✅ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ✅ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ✅ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ✅ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@yanghua
Copy link
Contributor Author

yanghua commented Mar 27, 2019

@sunjincheng121 Can you review this PR?

@lamberken
Copy link
Member

+1

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@

public HeartbeatServices(long heartbeatInterval, long heartbeatTimeout) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(0L < heartbeatInterval, "The heartbeat interval must be larger than 0.");
Preconditions.checkArgument(heartbeatInterval <= heartbeatTimeout, "The heartbeat timeout should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout.");
Preconditions.checkArgument(heartbeatInterval <= heartbeatTimeout, "The heartbeat interval should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout.");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the actual comparison, it looks like the second timeout should be changed to interval at the end of message.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The heartbeat interval should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout -> The heartbeat timeout should be larger or equal than the heartbeat interval

Copy link
Member

@sunjincheng121 sunjincheng121 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch @yanghua!

Will be merged after you fix the comment.

Best,
Jincheng

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@

public HeartbeatServices(long heartbeatInterval, long heartbeatTimeout) {
Preconditions.checkArgument(0L < heartbeatInterval, "The heartbeat interval must be larger than 0.");
Preconditions.checkArgument(heartbeatInterval <= heartbeatTimeout, "The heartbeat timeout should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout.");
Preconditions.checkArgument(heartbeatInterval <= heartbeatTimeout, "The heartbeat interval should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout.");
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The heartbeat interval should be larger or equal than the heartbeat timeout -> The heartbeat timeout should be larger or equal than the heartbeat interval

@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member

@flinkbot approve description
@flinkbot approve consensus

@yanghua
Copy link
Contributor Author

yanghua commented Apr 9, 2019

@azagrebin @sunjincheng121 Thanks for pointing the mistake and sorry for the late reply, I attended the Flink Forward SF 2019 and just come back today. I have updated the PR.

@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member

Thank you for participating in 2019 flink forward, I believe that there is a great gain. @yanghua!

Merging...

@flinkbot approve all
Best,
Jincheng

sunjincheng121 pushed a commit to sunjincheng121/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
@asfgit asfgit closed this in dca64c2 Apr 9, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2019
HuangZhenQiu pushed a commit to HuangZhenQiu/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
sunhaibotb pushed a commit to sunhaibotb/flink that referenced this pull request May 8, 2019
tianchen92 pushed a commit to tianchen92/flink that referenced this pull request May 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants