Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEODE-9070: Fix flaky behavior in ClientServerSessionCacheDUnit tests #6390

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

sabbey37
Copy link
Member

@sabbey37 sabbey37 commented Apr 28, 2021

Wait until cache server is running before attempting to start the client or validate the server.

@sabbey37 sabbey37 marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2021 21:45
@sabbey37
Copy link
Member Author

Feel free to suggest or add other log statements that might be helpful in debugging if the failure happens again.

@@ -97,6 +100,9 @@ protected Cache verifyCacheExists() {
}

if (cache == null) {
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Creating a new cache in BootstrappingFunction");
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this the proper log level?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd suggest to setting it to info so that it's always visible.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea!

@sabbey37 sabbey37 marked this pull request as draft May 4, 2021 13:34
@sabbey37
Copy link
Member Author

sabbey37 commented Jun 4, 2021

Closed in favor of: #6567

@sabbey37 sabbey37 closed this Jun 4, 2021
@sabbey37 sabbey37 deleted the bugfix/GEODE-9070 branch July 20, 2021 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants