-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HADOOP-17891. Fix compilation error under skipShade (ADDENDUM) #3441
Conversation
cc @sunchao |
cc @ayushtkn too |
(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. |
@viirya I think you should use |
Oops! Fixed. Thanks. |
(!) A patch to the testing environment has been detected. |
Seems okay now. patch-shadedclient.txt was passed. |
The -1 from shadedclient is for branch-shadedclient.txt. But why branch build uses the updated |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The build failure is just demonstrating what was broken.
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3441/2/artifact/out/branch-shadedclient.txt
It is fixed post the patch.
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-3441/2/artifact/out/patch-shadedclient.txt
The -1 from shadedclient is for branch-shadedclient.txt. But why branch build uses the updated dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh too?
Yahh, I know would be a bit annoying for you. But it is build like that...
Anyway, That won't block this from getting in. Tried Locally as well. Things work now.
Thanx @sunchao and @viirya for fixing this.
Thank you @ayushtkn ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> | ||
<artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId> | ||
<scope>test</scope> | ||
<type>test-jar</type> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: actually we may merge this with line 173
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is type test-jar. Can we merge with type jar (line 173)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It worked as far as I tried on #3447, while I think it would be ok to have dedicated section for both jar and test-jar side-by-side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it looks fine to me too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, pending @sunchao's comment.
Merged to trunk. Thanks @viirya ! |
Thank you @sunchao @ayushtkn @iwasakims ! |
This is a follow up for #3385 to fix the compilation error under skipShade.