Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BEAM-145] Fix timestamps in GroupAlsoByWindowsProperties #573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2016

Conversation

kennknowles
Copy link
Member

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

Some of the timestamps were not adjusted when BEAM-145 was fixed to respect the WindowFn's timestamps.

Some of the timestamps were not adjusted when
BEAM-145 was fixed to respect the WindowFn's
timestamps.
@kennknowles
Copy link
Member Author

R: @bjchambers

@bjchambers
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 190740f into apache:master Jul 1, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2016
@kennknowles kennknowles deleted the GABWProperties branch November 10, 2016 03:10
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
…pache#573)

Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@6b4d5a6
Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:f792ee1320e03eda2d13a5281a2989f7ed8a9e50b73ef6da97fac7e1e850b149

Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants