New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KAFKA-16565: IncrementalAssignmentConsumerEventHandler throws error when attempting to remove a partition that isn't assigned #15737
Merged
lucasbru
merged 6 commits into
apache:trunk
from
kirktrue:KAFKA-16565-check-topic-partition-before-removing
Apr 26, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4f07af6
KAFKA-16565: IncrementalAssignmentConsumerEventHandler throws error w…
kirktrue 96123fa
One stupid mistake, and minor logging clean up
kirktrue d5b6466
Merge branch 'trunk' into KAFKA-16565-check-topic-partition-before-re…
kirktrue 6a7758a
Changing logging to assert to help troubleshoot assignment issues
kirktrue 45ec621
Minor wording change in assert message
kirktrue 530ee8c
Merge branch 'trunk' into KAFKA-16565-check-topic-partition-before-re…
kirktrue File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we understand why this situation is happening? Is it related maybe to the mismatch assignment failure we've seen elsewhere in the tests? My point is just to make sure we're not hiding the real failure with this change. I wouldn't expect that the consumer would ever receive a partition to revoke if it was not previously assigned right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You’re right @lianetm, this fix could result in a sweeping the problem under the rug, so to speak. I'll change the logic so that this case still results an error, but with more information so we can debug.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lianetm—I changed the logging to an
assert
that provides useful information for troubleshooting:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks! better I believe. Do we have a Jira to investigate the failure leading to this? it's concerning (and even more if the case is that is happening with the new protocol only??)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lianetm—I will file a JIra on this in the next day or two. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filed KAFKA-16623, FYI.