LUCENE-9057 Fix issues to get site up to par with current prod #10
Conversation
From svn commit 1869809 by namgyu 2019-11-14 18:56
From svn commit 1869810 by namgyu 2019-11-14 19:03
From svn commit 1869961 by janhoy 2019-11-18 09:37
From of svn commit 1869972 by janhoy 2019-11-18 14:31
…oving "Community" section which was moved way back Including update from svn commit 1870033 by ctargett 2019-11-19 23:01 Remove reference to PDF format Ref Guide
From svn commit 1870091 by ctargett 2019-11-21 16:28
From svn rev 1870748 Committed by jpountz 03/12/2019, 11:17
From svn rev 1870790 by ishan at 2019-12-04 05:26
From svn rev 1871148 by broustant at 2019-12-10 20:51
From svn rev 1872087 by jpountz at 2019-12-29 20:48
From svn rev 1872778 by ishan at 2020-01-14 14:07
…it is in the attic
|
Could you also update version numbers in the htaccess file? You can't backport this, but it's needed to have redirects working correctly. I am also not sure about some absolute urls introduced. Can we not simply remove them? The page should never ever refer to lucene.apache.org directly. Otherwise looks good. |
Done
Will have a look |
|
Thanks. We should possibly have an automatism. pelican should be able to also apply variable substitution in non markdown. I will try to figure that out. Uwe |
|
I propose to merge this PR now and then to do followup fixes, ok? |
|
Yes. Merge it. |
|
Thanks for the review |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9057
This invalidates #9 which had a messy git history
Here is an attempt to bring the new site up to date with current svn.
I have committed each svn commit separately onto this PR, and attributed with the original committers's id. I tried to fix the dates to the svn dates but could only do that for some commits.
Then there are some commits to fix various broken things such as bad links, outdated content, wiki links etc.
I am not quite sure why this PR appears to repeat some commits that are already in master branch (like "adding latest committers" by Houston and "manually trigger build" by Uwe). I think it may be because my local branch was not fully up to date with asf master before I started backporting from SVN, so I had to merge in those changes afterwards. This gives a bit messy history but I think the end result is ok.
There is still some work to do
The news pages show top N news, there should be some paging or "show all"
We still link to git-wip and call GitHub a "mirror"
Other